# Flaghand vs Agorapulse for teams that review posts

Agorapulse is a social media suite for publishing, answering messages and reporting across many networks. Flaghand is
a smaller publishing desk for people and their own AI agents. Both let a person review a draft before it goes out;
the difference is what happens to that approval if someone changes the post afterwards.

**Checked on October 26, 2026.** Every Agorapulse fact here comes from its own [pricing page](https://www.agorapulse.com/pricing/),
[approval workflow guide](https://support.agorapulse.com/en/articles/10346598-how-to-manage-post-approval-workflows),
[sending for approval guide](https://support.agorapulse.com/en/articles/8773562-how-to-send-a-post-for-approval),
[reviewer guide](https://support.agorapulse.com/en/articles/10353571-how-to-review-a-post-as-an-approver),
[MCP guide](https://support.agorapulse.com/en/articles/12960496-model-context-protocol-mcp-integration-explained),
[Open API overview](https://support.agorapulse.com/en/articles/12482304-agorapulse-s-open-api-explained) and
[API connection guide](https://support.agorapulse.com/en/articles/12417183-how-to-connect-to-agorapulse-s-open-api).
Prices and features change. This is a public-documentation comparison, not a signed-in product test.

## The short answer

- **Choose Agorapulse** for a shared inbox, client review, multi-stage approval chains, reports or more social networks.
- **Choose Flaghand** if your agent prepares X and LinkedIn posts and you want the server to require your passkey over
  the exact text, media, account and time before anything can go out. It is not a replacement for Agorapulse's inbox or reports.

## What Agorapulse costs

These are US-dollar list prices **per user per month**, not the price for the whole team:

| Plan | Paid monthly | Monthly equivalent, billed annually | Approval features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $99 | $79 | No simple approval workflow |
| Professional | $149 | $119 | Simple, one-step approval workflows |
| Advanced | $199 | $149 | Simple workflows and bulk approval |
| Custom | Tailored pricing | Tailored pricing | Multi-step approval workflows |

Standard, Professional and Advanced each include 10 social profiles; Custom lists unlimited profiles. Extra profiles
cost more. X publishing is listed as a separate X Lite or X Plus add-on, with its price available on request, so don't
treat the subscription price as the complete cost of an X setup.

For example, three Professional seats at the annual rate are $357 a month equivalent, or $4,284 a year, before taxes
and add-ons. Flaghand is in early access: public sign-up is not open yet and its pricing is not public.

## Where Agorapulse is better

- **More networks.** Its pricing page lists Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn company Pages and personal profiles, TikTok,
  X, YouTube, Threads, Pinterest, Bluesky and Google Business profiles. Network and post-format support vary; X needs
  the add-on above. Flaghand posts to X and LinkedIn personal profiles; its TikTok access is still in TikTok's review.
- **An inbox, not just publishing.** Agorapulse collects messages, comments and reviews. Higher plans add assignments,
  saved replies and more moderation tools. Flaghand has no shared social inbox.
- **Reports for the team or client.** Agorapulse includes audience and post reports and PDF/CSV exports; Advanced adds
  scheduled reports and combined-profile reporting. Flaghand's X numbers help identify best times and top posts, not
  a cross-network report builder or LinkedIn analytics.
- **Review chains.** Agorapulse can involve internal teammates and external reviewers, require everyone's approval,
  and, on Custom, route through multiple stages. Flaghand has owners and editors, not a configurable multi-stage
  client approval chain: editors draft and check, and owners approve.

## How Agorapulse review works

The author prepares the post with a date and time, selects reviewers or a workflow, adds an optional message, and
sends it for approval. Internal reviewers need suitable profile permissions; external reviewers use a Shared Calendar.
The author can require every selected reviewer to approve.

An internal reviewer opens the assigned post and chooses **Approve for all and save** or **Request changes**. An
external reviewer opens the post group and chooses **Approve** or requests changes. Approval schedules the post for
its chosen time, or advances it to the next workflow stage. An unapproved post is blocked at its scheduled time;
Agorapulse notes that approval within the next five minutes may still let it publish, but does not guarantee that.

That is useful human review. It is not the same as making an approved version immutable.

## Does approval cover the exact text and media?

**Agorapulse:** a person reviews the composed post, but its workflow guide explicitly lets profile Admins and Editors
unlock a locked post using **Edit this post** and save changes. After a completed workflow, the post stays Approved;
during a workflow, it stays on the same step. So approval status alone does not prove the current text and media are
unchanged from the version the reviewer saw. The cited pages do not describe a passkey signature over a content hash
or a final cryptographic check of that approved version before sending.

**Flaghand:** the agent checks each draft and requests approval through the desk. The owner reviews every post's
account, time, text, media and alt text. One passkey tap can approve the whole plan, but covers each post's snapshot:
Flaghand hashes the snapshots with SHA-256 and verifies the owner's signed assertion. The snapshot includes the exact
platform request. Changing posting content, media, account or time requires a new approval; the scheduler checks the
signed snapshot again immediately before sending. Internal labels and notes are not posting content.

The [approval reference](https://app.flaghand.com/docs/approvals) explains that boundary. It does not mean the owner must approve
posts one at a time, or that the software can prove they read every word.

## API and MCP access

Agorapulse has an **official remote MCP connector**, currently in beta, on all plans except Legacy. Its guide covers
Claude, ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot, subject to those clients' subscription and configuration requirements. It can
read social data, generate drafts and add calendar notes. For new posts, it does not automatically publish: drafts
must be scheduled and published inside Agorapulse. Do not mistake that for an entirely read-only connector: it also
documents sending inbox replies, subject to an organization's inbox approval workflow when one is configured.

Its **Open API requires Custom**. The overview describes analytics, listening, inbox operations, calendar notes and
media uploads, and mentions creating drafts. The connection guide still calls the API read-only, despite describing
write operations. Those public pages are inconsistent; neither cited guide documents a general post scheduling or
publishing endpoint. If API publishing is essential, these pages are not enough to promise it.

Flaghand's [agent documentation](https://app.flaghand.com/docs/agents) and [OpenAPI spec](https://app.flaghand.com/api/v1/openapi.json) are public.
Its API and MCP let an agent upload media, create or edit drafts, check them, request approval and read results. OAuth
connectors receive `read`, `drafts`, `media` and `request-approval`. **No API token scope can approve, schedule or post**;
owner approval routes refuse tokens regardless of scope. The CLI is not on npm yet; the hosted MCP does not require it.

## Side by side

| | Agorapulse | Flaghand |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Multi-network team publishing, inbox and reports | A person's agent prepares posts; an owner approves the exact plan |
| Entry price | Standard $99 per user monthly, or $79 equivalent billed annually | Early access; public sign-up and pricing not open |
| Team approval entry | Professional $149 monthly, or $119 equivalent billed annually, per user | Owner passkey approval; editors cannot approve |
| Approval stages | One-step from Professional; multi-step on Custom | One owner decision over each snapshot, optionally as one plan |
| Edit after workflow approval | Authorized edits can leave the post Approved | Posting-content changes need a new approval |
| New-post MCP writes | Drafts; schedule and publish in Agorapulse | Drafts, checks and approval requests; never approval or publication |
| Public API | Custom; public guides have conflicting read/write descriptions | Public reference; workspace-scoped token access |
| Shared inbox and reports | Yes | No shared inbox or cross-network report builder |

## After it posts

Flaghand reads X posts back and compares normalized text, author, hidden reply mentions, media count, available alt
text, reply chain and quote with the approved expectations. It does not verify link destinations or media-file bytes.
LinkedIn posts are not read back. Agorapulse offers post reports; the sources above do not document this kind of
comparison against an approved snapshot. A successful publish or an engagement report is not that comparison.

## Try Flaghand

Start with the [agent documentation](https://app.flaghand.com/docs/agents), or use the
[safety checklist](/docs/guides/let-an-ai-agent-post-safely) to compare any publishing tool.
[Get access to Flaghand](/schedule). For its current TikTok restrictions, see [Flaghand and TikTok](/tiktok).